1. Sauvca. Quality assurance in South African universities. Views from SAUVCA’s National Quality Assurance Forum; 2002.
2. Materu P. Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-saharan Africa: status, challenges, opportunities, and promising practices. World Bank Working Paper No.124.
3. The World Bank; Washington D.C. USA; 2007. Harvey L, Green D. “Defining Quality.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1993; 18(1):9–34.
4. Ncayiyana, Daniel J. Higher Education Quality Assurance and Accreditation in South Africa.”; 2006.
5. Stensaker B. Trance, Transparency and Transformation: The Impact of External Quality Monitoring on Higher Education.” Quality in Higher Education 2003; 9(2):151–9.
6. Khailany B, Linzey S. quality Assurance in Higher Education in the Kurdistan Region. Available at www.mhe-krg.org/Ku/node/9. Accessed at 8 Feb 2016.
7. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. On route to quality: The reformation of Higher Education in Kurdistan Region, Iraq; 2011.
8. Shinebourne P, Adams M. Q-methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis 2007; 18(1):103-16.
9. Davis CH, Michelle C. Q methodology in audience research: bridging the qualitative/quantitative ‘divide’? Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 2011; 8(2):559–93.
10. Brown SR: Q Methodology. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Edited by Given LM. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008.
11. Chinnis AS, Summer DE, Doerr C, Paulson DJ, Davis SM. Q-Methodology: a new way of assessing employee satisfaction. J Nurs Adm 2001; 31(5):252–9.
12. Karim K. Q methodology-advantages and the disadvantages of this research method. J Community Nurs 2001; 15(4):8–10.
13. van Exel NJA, de Graaf G. Q methodology: A sneak preview. 2005 [http://qmethod.org/articles/vanExel.pdf]
14. Smith NW. Current systems in psychology: history, theory, research, and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2001.
15. Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:270.
16. Smith NW. Current systems in psychology: history, theory, research, and applications. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2001.
17.Brouwer M. Q is accounting for tastes. Journal of Advertising Research 1999; 39(2):35-9.
18. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and Interpretation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
19. Cross RM. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Educ Res 2005; 20(2): 206-13.
20. Stainton R R. Q methodology. In Rethinking methods in psychology. Edited by Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:178-92.
21. Schmolck P. PQMethod software. 2002 [http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/]
22. Brown SR. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980.
23. Watts S, Stenner P: Doing Q methodology: theory, method, and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol 2005; 2:67–91.
24. Shinebourne P: Using Q method in qualitative research. IJQM 2009; 8(1):93–97.
25. Donner JC. Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: an introduction to the methodology. In Social Analysis: Selected tools and techniques. Edited by Bank TSDFW. Washington, D.C: The World Bank Social Development Department; 2001:24–59.
26. Wong BM, Levinson W, Shojania KG. Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions. Med Educ. 2012; 46(1): 107-19.
27. Filipe HP, Silva ED, Stulting AA, Golnik KC. Continuing Professional Development: Best Practices. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014; 21(2):134-41.
28. Husain M, Khan S. Students' feedback: An effective tool in teachers' evaluation system. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2016; 6(3):178-81. 29. Cohen P, McKeachie W. The role of colleagues in the evaluation of teaching. Improv Coll Univ Teach.1980; 28:147-54.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.